Because this was the core issue in the case, I’ll focus on this issue, rather than on the underlying factual dispute between the parties (a blogger named Crystal Cox, and several companies that Cox had criticized publicly.)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fbe9/4fbe9487630dd30cf1fb41e4b48a28bb79efcb64" alt=""
"Then, as to that single remaining statement, the Court confronted the issue of whether a blogger like Cox enjoys the same First Amendment protections that journalists do.
The Ninth Circuit held that Cox did, indeed, enjoy those same protections. (In contrast, the district judge had required Cox to produce “evidence of her status as a journalist” in order for her to be allowed to invoke those same First Amendment protections.)"
Source of Quotes and Full Article
http://verdict.justia.com/2014/02/03/ninth-circuit-holds-correctly-blogger-defamation-protection-journalist